Feminist hate the MRA and often shame and attack them but if the MRA was gone who would fight for mens rights and injustice against men?

Question

Feminist hate the MRA and often shame and attack them but if the MRA was gone who would fight for mens rights and injustice against men?

Answer 1

"Feminist hate the MRA and often shame and attack them but if the MRA was gone who would fight for mens rights and injustice against men?"



Well .... no one off the bat. But this brings up the reason why the MRA came about in the first place. It's a response to the direct consequences of feminism. When feminism started off, about legal Rights and opportunities that was one thing. But for the last 40 years or so it's been one privilege at the expense of men after another to the point where some had no option but to form a group to fight back.



This ends badly going forward from here. It's all the feminist movement's to lose as they have peaked, and can only forfeit their control of the gender narrative. Everything they have been doing seems to put them in a worse light. They have become vindictive and spiteful and have shown themselves to not be about equality at all.

Answer 2

So, let me help you out here.

Why don't you do a little research into everything Men's Rights (I'm talking the organizations, any of them) have actually done for men.

I'll wait.



Or I can tell you what you'll find.

Which is nothing.

Because Men's Rights doesn't fight for the rights of men.

They fight to destroy feminism.

They don't do anything to lift men up.

They only fight to kick the chair out from beneath feminism.

They will drag everyone else down before they will actually help men.



The only time I've ever seen men from Men's Rights actually fight for men, is when they're fighting to make rape of anyone and everyone legal. Including children.



Also, maybe you should look into actual studies of divorce and family laws in court.

When men want children, and they're actually willing to fight for them, they usually get them.

Even if those men are abusive shits.

Answer 3

Feminists are not against men and they are only against MRAs because MRAs are against them.



The feminists wanted to ally with the MRA at first and tried - it was the MRAs who spurned them and now feminists are constantly being attacked by the MRAs unfairly - with multiple lies, generalizations and propaganda.



This makes no sense if you think about it. If you say you are for men's rights but attack women's rights - you are not for human rights - you make a mockery of the idea of rights - and especially men's rights - what you are supposed to be fighting for - and that is what MRAs are doing - it is self defeating.

Answer 4

Feminism represents less them 20% of the female demographic and less them 10% of the female demographic age 28 and under.



MRA demographic is so small that the percentage is unquantifiable…



Feminism is dying this is a fact.



Feminist does not fight for or represent the views of most women and MRA definitely does not fight for or represent the views of most men.



MRA use Feminism like a boogeymen but the truth is that most men just do not agree with them just like most women do not agree with Feminism.

Answer 5

Of course all HUMANS hate those who seek to deny all rights to half the human race.



If YOU were HUMAN, you'd realize that most people working for human rights for all are feminists.



If the MRA were gone, EVERYONE would have a decent shot at full human rights.



MRA don't fight for rights for men; they just fight AGAINST rights for all women.

Answer 6

If the MRA was gone, nobody would be sticking up for injustices against men. That's precisely why feminists would like to shame them out of existence. Many of the pro-feminist policies are unjust to men and the MRM threatens that.



Feminist for example worked long and hard to make education favor girls. The MRM is drawing attention to how poorly boys are now doing, which could potentially undo all the favoritism towards girls that feminism worked so hard to make reality

Answer 7

The original women's rights movement fought for legal and social equality for women. Modern feminists talk about human rights but are more concerned with protecting upper class white women who, no doubt, contribute financially to the movement. Men's groups need to tackle the legal system which often holds men at bay with child support and visitation rights. Feminists won't help because they try to push women into being super-heroes that can have it all and this results in fathers being shunned from their child's life.

Answer 8

I only "hate MRAs" when they are fighting *against* women's rights, rather than raising legitimate issues that affect men.



If MRAs want to talk about the unfairness Selective Service, I'm fine with that. If they want to discuss unfair treatment of men in divorce court, I'm open to that discussion. If they want to discuss the ways in which our public school system disproportionately disadvantages young boys, that's a reasonable conversation to have.



But if all they want to do is try to pretend that there are no legitimate women's issues, or that false accusations of rape are as serious and as prevalent as actual rape, or that we live in a "matriarchy", or things like that, then I will tell them to, er, go have sexual congress with themselves.

Answer 9

MGTOW is doing its part.



We're teaching men how to make the right short and long term decisions in their personal life that best protect them.



There's nothing wrong with men protecting themselves physically, financially and emotionally.